Monday, November 10, 2014

O Brave New World!

For today's reaction post, take on the persona of one of the main characters of Huxley's Brave New World. 

Write a narrative from this character's point of view--you may employ either internal monologue or dialogue, or a combination of both.

Minimum word count: 700 words.

Please post your initial reply by class time on 11/12. Post at least one reply to a class member by 11/13.

Here's mine!

            It wasn’t about Lenina, although that’s what they thought—Bernard, Hemhotlz, and the others. How could it have been? She wasn’t real. She didn’t exist. She was manufactured. They all were. Only I was an accident. An actual person. I was as excited as Miranda to see them, that first day, those first few days. The brave new world and the people living in it. But that world doesn’t require bravery, or fear, or heart. It requires only soma.
            I couldn’t live in their world. They didn’t even realize what they’d lost. What had been taken from them. All for their own good. Mustapha Mond told me, “you can't make tragedies without social instability. The world's stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can't get. They're well off; they're safe; they're never ill; they're not afraid of death; they're blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they're plagued with no mothers or fathers; they've got no wives, or children, or lovers to feel strongly about; they're so conditioned that they practically can't help behaving as they ought to behave” (Huxley 201). Ignorance is bliss, clearly. But it is not for me. It can never be for me. You cannot unknow. “What’s done cannot be undone.” Pope brought that book of Shakespeare to Linda, and I read it. It became a part of me. Mond read it too, and then he hid it from the rest of the world. Someday, soon, there will be no one who could even begin to understand it.
            But Mond is wrong. There remains tragedy: this world is a tragedy, as long as I live to see it. The words of Shakespeare are all lost. What else is gone to dust, lost forever, that I will never know? We ought to all have been the heirs of everything that came before. But now mankind are the heirs of childish chants and feelies, decanting and soma. Lost—all is lost. And I am the only one who knows or cares. No one here can connect to me, and so I will remain alone.
"Thou seest we are not all alone unhappy:
This wide and universal theatre
Presents more woeful pageants than the scene”
Wherein we play in." (Shakespeare, As You Like It, Act 2 Scene 7)
But the woeful pageants are ended. Happiness revolves in an endless parade. But it is a hollow, empty happiness. How can they appreciate the light when they never know the darkness? They do not even notice when one another dies. The nurse at the hospital could not even give me the most basic, decent, human courtesy as my mother lay dying. Because I committed the unpardonable sin of saying the word mother. She could only focus on conditioning those horrible, endless twins. Those poor little monsters, who were never meant to be. Horrible, terrible magic: to take that one child and split him apart, over and over again, pervert him into something terrible and base, twenty where there should have been one, and all degraded.
That is the worst of it, those poor nameless bastards, and they are everywhere, cleaning and cooking and smiling their stupid smiles. That awful lab where they commit these atrocities: it is like the witches of Macbeth: “How now, you secret, black, and midnight hags! What is’t you do?’ --‘A deed without a name.”
            But in the end it’s not about the girl, or the soma, or Linda, or Mond. They don’t matter, and neither do I. It’s really about that boy who was never born, the egg which was blasted apart, the poison they fed him—he will never be. Could he have been the next William Shakespeare, before he became twenty window-washers with bad manners? It’s not about the loss of Shakespeare. He is dead and gone, his words are of the past. It’s the fact that there will never be another writer. Hemholtz is the last creative man alive, and the best he can do is that trash at the feelies. No more magical words will ever be written. No more songs will ever be written or sung, unless they’re childish rhymes to pacify the Gammas and the Betas. No more poems.
            I could write something so beautiful it would make a man cry. But there are no more men left. The Indians understand only the violence and the blood—Pope left that book on the floor like a piece of garbage. And no one in the brave new world could read anything written about pain, or loss, or real life. It would be a joke to them, just as Romeo and Juliet was.
            So there’s no point. There’s nothing more to do.

“Not a whit, we defy augury: there's a special
providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now,
'tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be
now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the
readiness is all: since no man has aught of what he
leaves, what is't to leave betimes?” (Hamlet, Act 5, Scene 2)


            

1 comment:

  1. Fantastic narrative Ms. Howard! Your story is a wonderful extension of John's reaction upon experiencing the Brave New World: bewildered and indignant. Moreover, I appreciate how you weave in extra quotes from the works of Shakespeare in order to articulate John's thoughts, just as Huxley does throughout the novel.

    The one line that really resonated with me was: "Pope brought that book of Shakespeare to Linda, and I read it. It became a part of me. Mond read it too, and then he hid it from the rest of the world." In this line, you cleverly juxtapose the characters of John and Mond. John, an outsider, can't comprehend the actions and behaviors of the World State. Also, we are occasionally led to believe that Mond disagrees with the government, which paradoxically contrasts his role as World Controller. Even so, he asserts that his desire to maintain human stability, the greater good, supersedes his personal agenda. As "outsiders," it is easy for us to side with John and criticize the State's actions. But Mond is a very testament to the fact that even those who are cognizant of the State's totalitarian power can't shake the force of the illusion. Human conditioning has hypnotized him for life. John is symbolic of the perceptual rift between the State citizens' biases and our biases as observers. We see the bruises on the apple, but everyone who lives inside the fruit is surrounded by deliciousness and would think nothing rotten of their home (pardon the metaphor.)

    Again, kudos!

    ReplyDelete